0.00/0.11	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.11	% Command    : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 240 THM
0.12/0.32	% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
0.12/0.32	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.12/0.32	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.12/0.32	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.12/0.32	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.12/0.32	% CPULimit   : 1920
0.12/0.32	% WCLimit    : 240
0.12/0.32	% DateTime   : Wed Jul 30 03:30:49 EDT 2025
0.12/0.33	% CPUTime    : 
0.18/0.46	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.18/0.52	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=240 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wrpmHARKb5/E---3.1_12842.p
0.60/0.69	# Version: 3.0.0-ho
0.60/0.69	# Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNHFA.
0.60/0.69	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.60/0.69	# Starting new_ho_10 with 1200s (5) cores
0.60/0.69	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 240s (1) cores
0.60/0.69	# Starting full_lambda_6 with 240s (1) cores
0.60/0.69	# Starting full_lambda_9 with 240s (1) cores
0.60/0.69	# full_lambda_9 with pid 12924 completed with status 0
0.60/0.69	# Result found by full_lambda_9
0.60/0.69	# Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNHFA.
0.60/0.69	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.60/0.69	# Starting new_ho_10 with 1200s (5) cores
0.60/0.69	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 240s (1) cores
0.60/0.69	# Starting full_lambda_6 with 240s (1) cores
0.60/0.69	# Starting full_lambda_9 with 240s (1) cores
0.60/0.69	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,4,,3,20000,3.0,true)
0.60/0.69	# Search class: HGHSM-FSLS31-DHFFFMBN
0.60/0.69	# partial match(2): HGHSM-FSLM31-DHFFFSBN
0.60/0.69	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total)
0.60/0.69	# Starting lpo8_lambda_fix with 130s (1) cores
0.60/0.69	# lpo8_lambda_fix with pid 12925 completed with status 0
0.60/0.69	# Result found by lpo8_lambda_fix
0.60/0.69	# Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNHFA.
0.60/0.69	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.60/0.69	# Starting new_ho_10 with 1200s (5) cores
0.60/0.69	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 240s (1) cores
0.60/0.69	# Starting full_lambda_6 with 240s (1) cores
0.60/0.69	# Starting full_lambda_9 with 240s (1) cores
0.60/0.69	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,4,,3,20000,3.0,true)
0.60/0.69	# Search class: HGHSM-FSLS31-DHFFFMBN
0.60/0.69	# partial match(2): HGHSM-FSLM31-DHFFFSBN
0.60/0.69	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total)
0.60/0.69	# Starting lpo8_lambda_fix with 130s (1) cores
0.60/0.69	# Preprocessing time       : 0.011 s
0.60/0.69	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.60/0.69	
0.60/0.69	# Proof found!
0.60/0.69	# SZS status Theorem
0.60/0.69	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.60/0.69	thf(decl_sort1, type, nat: $tType).
0.60/0.69	thf(decl_sort2, type, config256849571t_unit: $tType).
0.60/0.69	thf(decl_sort3, type, list_c1059388851t_unit: $tType).
0.60/0.69	thf(decl_sort4, type, list_message_p_v: $tType).
0.60/0.69	thf(decl_24, type, fLPThe1519354920_p_v_s: config256849571t_unit > (list_c1059388851t_unit > list_message_p_v > list_c1059388851t_unit) > (list_c1059388851t_unit > list_message_p_v > list_message_p_v) > nat > list_c1059388851t_unit).
0.60/0.69	thf(decl_27, type, zero_zero_nat: nat).
0.60/0.69	thf(decl_38, type, cons_c1162654829t_unit: config256849571t_unit > list_c1059388851t_unit > list_c1059388851t_unit).
0.60/0.69	thf(decl_44, type, nil_co1338500125t_unit: list_c1059388851t_unit).
0.60/0.69	thf(decl_82, type, cfg: config256849571t_unit).
0.60/0.69	thf(decl_83, type, fStepCfg: list_c1059388851t_unit > list_message_p_v > list_c1059388851t_unit).
0.60/0.69	thf(decl_84, type, fStepMsg: list_c1059388851t_unit > list_message_p_v > list_message_p_v).
0.60/0.69	thf(decl_85, type, fe: nat > list_c1059388851t_unit).
0.60/0.69	thf(conj_0, conjecture, ((fe @ zero_zero_nat)=(cons_c1162654829t_unit @ cfg @ nil_co1338500125t_unit)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wrpmHARKb5/E---3.1_12842.p', conj_0)).
0.60/0.69	thf(fact_1_fe__def, axiom, ((fe)=(fLPThe1519354920_p_v_s @ cfg @ fStepCfg @ fStepMsg)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wrpmHARKb5/E---3.1_12842.p', fact_1_fe__def)).
0.60/0.69	thf(fact_2_infiniteExecutionCfg_Osimps_I1_J, axiom, ![X102:config256849571t_unit, X103:list_c1059388851t_unit > list_message_p_v > list_c1059388851t_unit, X104:list_c1059388851t_unit > list_message_p_v > list_message_p_v]:(((fLPThe1519354920_p_v_s @ X102 @ X103 @ X104 @ zero_zero_nat)=(cons_c1162654829t_unit @ X102 @ nil_co1338500125t_unit))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wrpmHARKb5/E---3.1_12842.p', fact_2_infiniteExecutionCfg_Osimps_I1_J)).
0.60/0.69	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ((fe @ zero_zero_nat)!=(cons_c1162654829t_unit @ cfg @ nil_co1338500125t_unit)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0])])).
0.60/0.69	thf(c_0_4, plain, ((fe)=(fLPThe1519354920_p_v_s @ cfg @ fStepCfg @ fStepMsg)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_1_fe__def])).
0.60/0.69	thf(c_0_5, plain, ![X2597:config256849571t_unit, X2598:list_c1059388851t_unit > list_message_p_v > list_c1059388851t_unit, X2599:list_c1059388851t_unit > list_message_p_v > list_message_p_v]:(((fLPThe1519354920_p_v_s @ X2597 @ X2598 @ X2599 @ zero_zero_nat)=(cons_c1162654829t_unit @ X2597 @ nil_co1338500125t_unit))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_2_infiniteExecutionCfg_Osimps_I1_J])).
0.60/0.69	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ((fe @ zero_zero_nat)!=(cons_c1162654829t_unit @ cfg @ nil_co1338500125t_unit)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
0.60/0.69	thf(c_0_7, plain, ![X4:nat]:(((fLPThe1519354920_p_v_s @ cfg @ fStepCfg @ fStepMsg @ X4)=(fe @ X4))), inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.60/0.69	thf(c_0_8, plain, ![X104:list_c1059388851t_unit > list_message_p_v > list_message_p_v, X103:list_c1059388851t_unit > list_message_p_v > list_c1059388851t_unit, X30:config256849571t_unit]:(((fLPThe1519354920_p_v_s @ X30 @ X103 @ X104 @ zero_zero_nat)=(cons_c1162654829t_unit @ X30 @ nil_co1338500125t_unit))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.60/0.69	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ((fe @ zero_zero_nat)!=(cons_c1162654829t_unit @ cfg @ nil_co1338500125t_unit)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.60/0.69	thf(c_0_10, plain, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8]), c_0_9]), ['proof']).
0.60/0.69	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.60/0.69	# Parsed axioms                        : 419
0.60/0.69	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 218
0.60/0.69	# Initial clauses                      : 436
0.60/0.69	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 9
0.60/0.69	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 427
0.60/0.69	# Processed clauses                    : 512
0.60/0.69	# ...of these trivial                  : 6
0.60/0.69	# ...subsumed                          : 57
0.60/0.69	# ...remaining for further processing  : 449
0.60/0.69	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 47
0.60/0.69	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.60/0.69	# Backward-subsumed                    : 1
0.60/0.69	# Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.60/0.69	# Generated clauses                    : 86
0.60/0.69	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 68
0.60/0.69	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.60/0.69	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
0.60/0.69	# Paramodulations                      : 28
0.60/0.69	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.60/0.69	# NegExts                              : 0
0.60/0.69	# Equation resolutions                 : 50
0.60/0.69	# Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.60/0.69	# Total rewrite steps                  : 13
0.60/0.69	# ...of those cached                   : 2
0.60/0.69	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.60/0.69	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.60/0.69	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.60/0.69	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.60/0.69	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.60/0.69	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.60/0.69	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.60/0.69	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.60/0.69	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.60/0.69	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.60/0.69	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.60/0.69	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.60/0.69	# Current number of processed clauses  : 41
0.60/0.69	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 12
0.60/0.69	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
0.60/0.69	#    Negative unit clauses             : 14
0.60/0.69	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 14
0.60/0.69	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 347
0.60/0.69	# ...number of literals in the above   : 1199
0.60/0.69	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.60/0.69	# Current number of archived clauses   : 365
0.60/0.69	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 25971
0.60/0.69	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5608
0.60/0.69	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 21
0.60/0.69	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 78
0.60/0.69	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.60/0.69	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 879
0.60/0.69	# BW rewrite match successes           : 1
0.60/0.69	# Condensation attempts                : 512
0.60/0.69	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.60/0.69	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 71802
0.60/0.69	# Search garbage collected termcells   : 17513
0.60/0.69	
0.60/0.69	# -------------------------------------------------
0.60/0.69	# User time                : 0.109 s
0.60/0.69	# System time              : 0.014 s
0.60/0.69	# Total time               : 0.123 s
0.60/0.69	# Maximum resident set size: 5224 pages
0.60/0.69	
0.60/0.69	# -------------------------------------------------
0.60/0.69	# User time                : 0.128 s
0.60/0.69	# System time              : 0.018 s
0.60/0.69	# Total time               : 0.146 s
0.60/0.69	# Maximum resident set size: 3108 pages
0.60/0.69	% E exiting
0.60/0.69	% E exiting
0.60/0.69	EOF